Germline and Somatic mutations in postmenopausal breast cancer patients

OBJECTIVES: In breast cancer (BC) patients, the frequency of germline BRCA mutations (gBRCA) may vary according to the ethnic background, age, and family history of cancer. Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) is the second most common somatic mutated gene in BC; however, the association of mutations in both genes with cancer has not been thoroughly investigated. Thus, our aims were to investigate gBRCA mutation frequency in a cohort of postmenopausal Brazilian BC patients and the association of gBRCA1/BRCA2 and PIK3CA somatic mutations. METHODS: Forty-nine postmenopausal (>55 years) and forty-one young (≤35 years) BC patients were included in this study. The postmenopausal group included patients who reported a positive family history of cancer. For these patients, gBRCA1/BRCA2 were sequenced using next-generation sequencing (NGS) or Sanger sequencing. Data for gBRCA in young patients were already available from a previous study. DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumors was obtained from 27 postmenopausal and 41 young patients for analyzing exons 9 and 20 of PIK3CA. The association between gBRCA1/BRCA2 and somatic mutations in PIK3CA was investigated. RESULTS: The overall frequency of gBRCA1/BRCA2 among the 49 postmenopausal patients was 10.2%. The frequencies of somatic mutations in PIK3CA in the postmenopausal and young patients were 37% and 17%, respectively (ns). The most common PIK3CA mutation was found to be E454A. Nonsense and frameshift mutations, which may counteract the oncogenic potential of PIK3CA were also detected. Regardless of age, 25% of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers and non-carriers , each, had PIK3CA somatic mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Data obtained indicate that BRCA1/BRCA2 gene testing may be considered for postmenopausal patients with BC who have a family history of cancer. Although some of them are not considered pathogenic, somatic variants of PIK3CA are frequently observed in BC patients, especially in postmenopausal patients.

Câncer e Doenças Cardiovasculares na Pandemia de COVID-19 / Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Resumo O desafio imposto ao sistema de saúde pela pandemia da COVID-19 faz com que haja uma necessidade de readequações de rotinas e serviços de saúde, com os objetivos de controlar a disseminação do vírus e preservar a saúde. Torna-se ainda mais importante o manejo seguro e correto dos pacientes dos grupos de risco, como os pacientes idosos, os portadores de doenças cardiovasculares e os pacientes com câncer. Dessa forma, a cardio-oncologia ganha novo dimensionamento, no intuito de se adequar às necessidades dos pacientes diante de uma pandemia, reestruturando o sistema de atendimento de forma a oferecer qualidade e segurança na assistência à saúde.

Abstract The challenges that the COVID-19 pandemic cretead to the healthcare system have made it necessary to adapt routines and services, with the objectives of controlling the spread of the virus and preserving health. Safe and correct management of patients in risks groups, such as elderly patients, patients with cardiovascular diseases, and patients with cancer, has become even more important. Thus, cardio-oncology has gained a new dimension, with the aim of adapting to patients' needs during the pandemic by restructuring the system of care in a manner that offers quality and safety in healthcare.

Diretrizes para detecção precoce do câncer de mama no Brasil. II - Novas recomendações nacionais, principais evidências e controvérsias / Directrices para la detección precoz del cáncer de mama en Brasil. II - Nuevas recomendaciones nacionales, principales evidencias y controversias / Guidelines for early detection of breast cancer in Brazil. II - New national recommendations, main evidence, and controversies

Resumo: O câncer de mama é a principal causa de morte por câncer em mulheres no Brasil. As novas diretrizes para detecção precoce no Brasil foram elaboradas com base em revisões sistemáticas da literatura sobre riscos e possíveis benefícios de diversas estratégias de detecção precoce. O objetivo do presente artigo é apresentar as recomendações e atualizar a síntese de evidências, discutindo as principais controvérsias existentes. As recomendações para o rastreamento do câncer de mama (mulheres assintomáticas) foram: (i) recomendação contrária forte ao rastreamento com mamografia em mulheres com menos de 50 anos; (ii) recomendação favorável fraca ao rastreamento com mamografia em mulheres com idades entre 50 e 69 anos; (iii) recomendação contrária fraca ao rastreamento com mamografia em mulheres com idades entre 70 e 74 anos; (iv) recomendação contrária forte ao rastreamento com mamografia em mulheres com 75 anos ou mais; (v) recomendação favorável forte de que o rastreamento nas faixas etárias recomendadas seja bienal, quando comparada às periodicidades menores do que a bienal; (vi) recomendação contrária fraca ao ensino do autoexame das mamas para rastreamento; (vii) ausência de recomendação favorável ou contrária ao rastreamento com exame clínico das mamas; e (viii) recomendação contrária forte ao rastreamento com ressonância nuclear magnética, ultrassonografia, termografia ou tomossíntese, seja isoladamente, seja como complemento à mamografia. As recomendações para o diagnóstico precoce do câncer de mama (mulheres com sinais ou sintomas suspeitos) foram: (i) recomendação favorável fraca à implementação de estratégias de conscientização para o diagnóstico precoce do câncer de mama; (ii) recomendação favorável fraca ao uso de sinais e sintomas selecionados nas presentes diretrizes como critério de referência urgente para serviços de diagnóstico mamário; e (iii) recomendação favorável fraca de que toda a avaliação diagnóstica do câncer de mama, após a identificação de sinais e sintomas suspeitos na atenção primária, seja feita em um mesmo centro de referência.

Resumen: El cáncer de mama es la principal causa de muerte por cáncer en mujeres en Brasil. Las nuevas directrices para la detección precoz en Brasil fueron elaboradas basándose en revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura sobre riesgos y posibles beneficios de diversas estrategias de detección precoz. El objetivo del presente artículo es presentar las recomendaciones y actualizar la síntesis de evidencias, discutiendo las principales controversias existentes. Las recomendaciones para el tamizaje del cáncer de mama (mujeres asintomáticas) fueron: (i) fuerte recomendación contraria al tamizaje con mamografía en mujeres con menos de 50 años; (ii) baja recomendación favorable al tamizaje con mamografía en mujeres con edades entre 50 y 69 años; (iii) baja recomendación contraria al tamizaje con mamografía en mujeres con edades entre 70 y 74 años; (iv) fuerte recomendación contraria al tamizaje con mamografía en mujeres con 75 años o más; (v) fuerte recomendación favorable de que el tamizaje en las franjas etarias recomendadas sea bienal, cuando se compara con periodicidades menores a la bienal; (vi) baja recomendación contraria a la enseñanza del autoexamen de las mamas para tamizaje; (vii) ausencia de recomendación favorable o contraria al tamizaje con examen clínico de las mamas; y (viii) fuerte recomendación contraria al tamizaje con resonancia magnética nuclear, ultrasonografía, termografía o tomosíntesis, bien sea aisladamente, bien sea como complemento a la mamografía. Las recomendaciones para el diagnóstico precoz del cáncer de mama (mujeres con señales o síntomas sospechosos): (i) baja recomendación favorable a la implementación de estrategias de concienciación para el diagnóstico precoz del cáncer de mama; (ii) baja recomendación favorable al uso de señales y síntomas seleccionados en las presentes directrices como criterio de referencia urgente para servicios de diagnóstico mamario; y (iii) baja recomendación favorable de que toda la evaluación diagnóstica del cáncer de mama, tras la identificación de señales y síntomas sospechosos en la atención primaria, sea realizada en un mismo centro de referencia.

Abstract: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in Brazilian women. The new Brazilian guidelines for early detection of breast cancer were drafted on the basis of systematic literature reviews on the possible harms and benefits of various early detection strategies. This article aims to present the recommendations and update the summary of evidence, discussing the main controversies. Breast cancer screening recommendations (in asymptomatic women) were: (i) strong recommendation against mammogram screening in women under 50 years of age; (ii) weak recommendation for mammogram screening in women 50 to 69 years of age; (iii) weak recommendation against mammogram screening in women 70 to 74 years of age; (iv) strong recommendation against mammogram screening in women 75 years or older; (v) strong recommendation that screening in the recommended age brackets should be every two years as opposed to shorter intervals; (vi) weak recommendation against teaching breast self-examination as screening; (vii) absence of recommendation for or against screening with clinical breast examination; and (viii) strong recommendation against screening with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, thermography, or tomosynthesis alone or as a complement to mammography. The recommendations for early diagnosis of breast cancer (in women with suspicious signs or symptoms) were: (i) weak recommendation for the implementation of awareness-raising strategies for early diagnosis of breast cancer; (ii) weak recommendation for use of selected signs and symptoms in the current guidelines as the criterion for urgent referral to specialized breast diagnosis services; and (iii) weak recommendation that every breast cancer diagnostic workup after the identification of suspicious signs and symptoms in primary care should be done in the same referral center.

Homologous recombination deficiency in ovarian cancer: a review of its epidemiology and management

Ovarian cancer patients with homologous recombination deficiencies exhibit specific clinical behaviors, and improved responses to treatments, such as platinum-based chemotherapy and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, have been observed. Germline mutations in the BRCA 1/2 genes are the most well-known mechanisms of homologous recombination deficiency. However, other mechanisms, such as germline and somatic mutations in other homologous recombination genes and epigenetic modifications, have also been implicated in homologous recombination deficiency. The epidemiology and implications of these other mechanisms need to be better understood to improve the treatment strategies for these patients. Furthermore, an evaluation of various diagnostic tests to investigate homologous recombination deficiency is essential. Comprehension of the role of homologous recombination deficiency in ovarian cancer also allows the development of therapeutic combinations that can improve the efficacy of treatment. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology and management of homologous recombination deficiency in ovarian cancer patients.

Cost effectiveness of the cancer prevention program for carriers of the BRCA1/2 mutation

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: To analyze the cost effectiveness of the diagnostic program for the germline mutation in BRCA1/2 genes and of preventative strategies for the relatives of patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer associated with this mutation. METHODS: The study analyzed the cost effectiveness by developing an analysis of the Markov decision process from the perspective of the National Health System. The strategies compared reflect upon the adoption of genetic testing and preventative strategies for relatives or the usual care currently proposed. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was expressed in terms of cost per case avoided. The sensitivity analysis was performed in a univariate and deterministic manner. RESULTS: The study showed increments for effectiveness and for costs when performing genetic testing and adopting prophylactic measures for family members. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated at R$908.58 per case of cancer avoided, a figure considered lower than the study's cost-effectiveness threshold (R$7,543.50). CONCLUSIONS: The program analyzed should be considered a cost-effective strategy for the national situation. Studies in various other countries have reached similar conclusions. One possible ramification of this research might the need to perform a budgetary-impact analysis of making the program one of the country's health policies.

Association of family risk and lifestyle/comorbidities in ovarian cancer patients / Associação de história familiar e estilo de vida a comorbidades em pacientes com câncer de ovário.

Summary Objectives: to analyze factors that might indicate familial predisposition for ovarian cancer in patients diagnosed with this disease. Methods: in a prospective single center cohort study at the Institute of Cancer of the State of São Paulo (ICESP), 51 women diagnosed with ovarian cancer were included. Familial predisposition for ovarian cancer was defined as having a higher than 10% chance of having a BRCA1/2 mutation according to the Manchester scoring system, a validated method to assess the likelihood of mutation detection. Each patient was interviewed with a standardized questionnaire on established risk factors for ovarian cancer and other factors that might influence the risk to develop ovarian cancer. Logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the impact of the evaluated factors on the likelihood of mutation detection, by calculating odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Results: seventeen out of 51 patients had a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, four patients had a history of breast or endometrial cancer, 11 were diagnosed before the age of 50, and 12 presented a risk of familial predisposition to ovarian cancer higher than 10%. Patients with comorbidities, such as hypertension, diabetes, hormonal disorders, dyslipidemia and psychiatric conditions, presented a lower chance of having a familial predisposition for ovarian cancer (OR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.06-0.88; p=0.03). Conclusion: in this study, having comorbidities was associated with a lower risk of having a familial predisposition for ovarian cancer. Other factors associated with the risk of ovarian cancer did not have an impact on this predisposition. .

Resumo Objetivos: analisar fatores que possam indicar uma predisposição familiar ao câncer de ovário em pacientes com este diagnóstico. Métodos: em estudo de coorte prospectiva realizado no Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), foram incluídas 51 mulheres diagnosticadas com câncer de ovário entre janeiro de 2009 e dezembro de 2011. Predisposição familiar para câncer de ovário foi definida como um risco maior de 10% de apresentar uma mutação em BRCA1/2, de acordo com o sistema de pontes de Manchester, um método validado para avaliar a probabilidade de detecção de mutação nesses genes. Cada paciente foi entrevistada com um questionário padronizado, abordando fatores de risco para câncer de ovário e outros fatores que pudessem influenciar o risco de desenvolver a doença. O impacto dos fatores avaliados na probabilidade de detecção da mutação foi avaliado com regressões logísticas. Resultados: dezessete das 51 pacientes referiram história familiar de câncer de mama e/ou ovário, quatro pacientes apresentavam antecedente pessoal de câncer de mama ou endométrio, 11 haviam sido diagnosticadas antes dos 50 anos e 12 apresentaram um risco maior que 10% de predisposição familiar a câncer de ovário. Pacientes com comorbidades como hipertensão, diabetes, disfunções hormonais, dislipidemia e distúrbios psiquiátricos apresentaram menor risco de predisposição familiar ao câncer de ovário (OR: 0.22; IC 95%: 0.06-0.88; p=0.03). Conclusão: neste estudo, apresentar alguma comorbidade foi associado a um menor risco de ter uma predisposição familiar ao câncer de ovário. Outros fatores associados ao risco de câncer de ovário não tiveram nenhum impacto sobre esta predisposição. .

Impacto do encaminhamento para ambulatório de câncer hereditário na qualidade de vida de pacientes portadoras de câncer de mama / Impacto of hereditary breast cancer evaluation the quality of life of patients diagnosed with breast cancer

Neste trabalho, medimos o impacto da avaliação do risco de mutações dos genes BRCA1/2 na qualidade de vida (QV) de pacientes (pts) com câncer de mama, avaliada pelos questionários EORTC QLQ-C30 e QLQ-BR23. Convidamos 282 pts a participar, respondendo aos questionários antes e depois da avaliação do risco pelos métodos de Frank, Evans e BRCAPRO. Consideramos risco elevado pelo menos 10 por cento. 272 foram incluídas e 198 completaram o estudo. Nas 180 avaliáveis, não detectamos alterações significativas da QV. Classificamos 45 como risco elevado por Frank, 35 pelo BRCAPRO e 21 por Evans, 12 pelos 3 métodos. Concluímos que pts com câncer de mama desejam ser informadas quanto ao seu risco de câncer hereditário e que a avaliação não causa stress adicional. Instrumentos locais de mensuração de risco são também desejáveis...

Here we evaluated the impact of breast cancer hereditary cancer risk evaluation on the quality of life (QOL) in a population of breast cancer patients (pts), as measured by the EORTC questionnaires QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23. Of the 282 invited pts, 272 agree to participate and answered QLQ before and after the risk determination by Frank, Evans and BRCAPRO methods. High risk was defined as at least 10 per cent. Overall 198 pts completed the study. In the 180 evaluable pts., we did not detected significant differences in QOL. There were 45 pts classified as high risk by Frank, 35 by the BRCAPRO and 21 by Evans, agreement being reached in 12. We conclude that pts wish to know about their hereditary breast cancer risk, and this do not cause necessarily more stress. Apart from that, there is a need for local methods of risk calculation...